Charles
Wesley, (1707-1788), divine and hymn-writer, eighteenth child, youngest and
third surviving son of Samuel Wesley (1662-1735), was born at Epworth Rectory,
Lincolnshire, [England], on 18 December 1707. A seven months' child, he was
reared with difficulty.
In 1716 he entered Westminster school, under the care and at the cost of his
brother Samuel, till he was elected king's scholar in 1721. Among his school-fellows
was William Murray (afterwards first Earl of Mansfield). Wesley, who was
captain of the school (1725), was Murray's protector from ill-usage on the
score of his Jacobite origin. He showed dramatic ability and quickness in
acquirement, and bore a high character, though his lively disposition got
him into scrapes. John Wesley affirmed (in an unfinished sketch of his brother's
life, written 1790, and meant for publication) that at this period Garrett
Wesley or Wellesley (died 23 September 1728) of Dangan, Co. Meath,
wrote to his father proposing to provide for Charles's education and adopt
him as his heir. Money was accordingly paid for his schooling for some years,
but Charles was unwilling to go to Ireland ...
In 1726 Charles entered Christ Church, Oxford, as a Westminster student, matriculating
on 13 June. For the first year he was indisposed to pass from the tutelage
of his brother Samuel to that of John, then fellow of Lincoln. 'He would
warmly answer, "What, would you have me to be a saint all at once?" and
would hear no more.' His application to study was coincident with John's
removal from Oxford (1727). Study brought 'serious thinking' in its train.
He began to attend the weekly sacrament. In January 1729 he began a diary,
kept it regularly for twenty years, then intermittently till 1756; the discontinuance
was ascribed by his brother to 'wrong humility.' By the spring of 1729 (six
months before John's return to Oxford, in November) he had 'persuaded two
or three young scholars to accompany me, and to observe the method of study
prescribed by the statutes of the university. This gained me the harmless
nickname of methodist' (letter to Thomas Bradbury Chandler, 28 April 1785).
The bestowal of the nickname is assigned by John Wesley to 'a young gentleman
of Christ Church.' Its meaning has been much discussed. Watson (Life of
John Wesley, 1839, p. 12) has cited its use as a religious designation
('plain, pack-staff methodists') as early as 1639. Daniel Williams and his
followers were described (1693) as 'new methodists in the great point of
justification.' John Wesley thought there was an allusion to the 'medici
methodici' (as opposed to empirics). But there is no reason for questioning
the testimony of Charles. He was called a 'methodist' for advocating a system
of study. The religious reference was not the primary one; the word meant
little more than 'prig' (see PHILLIPS, New World of Words, 6th edit.
1706, ed. Kersey, where 'methodist' is glossed 'one that treats of a method,
or affects to be methodical').
In 1730 Charles graduated B.A. and began to take pupils. He was an excellent
scholar, an especially good Latinist. His plan of associated study and religious
exercises assumed new proportions under his brother's [John Wesley] lead.
He threw himself into the movement with conspicuous zeal. It was to Charles
Wesley that George Whitefield first turned (1732) when he felt drawn to the
methodist movement. Yet he looked forward to no career beyond that of a tutor,
and 'exceedingly dreaded entering into holy orders.' This dread was partly
due to introspective views of religion derived from mystical writers, whose
influence he never entirely shook off. He graduated M.A. on 12 March 1732-3.
His copy of Fell's 'Life' of Hammond, with the autograph date 1734, and
the motto 'Longe Sequar,' has been preserved (WAKELEY, Anecdotes, 1870,
p. 379). In face of the opposition of his brother Samuel, who thought him
unfit for the work, he joined John in the mission to Georgia, going as secretary
to James Edward Oglethorpe, the governor. On the advice of John Burton (1696-1771),
he was ordained deacon by John Potter (1674?-1747), then bishop of Oxford,
and priest by Edmund Gibson, bishop of London, in October 1735, just before
starting.
Leaving his brother at Savannah, Wesley reached (9 March 1736) Frederica,
St. Simon's Island, Oglethorpe's residence. From this date his 'Journal'
becomes available. He was to minister to the colonists and convert the Indians.
His stay was not long; his strictness made him enemies in a lax community;
by his refusal to recognize lay-baptism, he prejudiced his efforts for moral
reform; he did not get on with Oglethorpe, and even welcomed 'a friendly
fever.' On 13 May he left for secretarial duties at Savannah. He was anxious
to resign his post. Taking dispatches from Oglethorpe to the Georgia trustees
and the board of trade, he left Savannah on 26 July in very unfit health
for a stormy voyage in an unseaworthy vessel. After delays at Charlestown
and Boston, he landed at Deal on 3 December 1736. He did not resign the secretaryship
till 3 April 1738, when the state of his health and his brother's advice
(that he should remain at Oxford) led him to give up the idea of the Georgia
mission. He had previously made vain efforts to induce the ecclesiastical
authorities to recognize Moravian co-operation. His intercourse with Zinzendorf
began on 19 January 1737. He was able to aid Zinzendorf, through his acquaintance
with Bishop Potter.
By Potter's advice, be joined (26 August 1737) the Oxford deputation with
an address to the throne at Hampton Court. Shortly after, he consulted William
Law on religious matters, without gaining satisfaction. In February 1738
he came under the influence of Peter Böhler, who learned English from
him, during a visit at Oxford. Wesley does not seem to have learned German.
The perusal of Luther on Galatians, which he met with in May, gave clearness
to his religious ideas. Whit-Sunday (21 May 1738) he fixes as the date of
his conversion; a similar experience reached his brother John on the following
Wednesday. Full of new zeal, he resumed preaching on 2 July. On 24 July he
became unlicensed curate to George Stonehouse of St. Mary's, Islington; he
read daily prayers, preached constantly in London churches, visited Newgate,
and held private meetings for exposition and devotion. On 20 October he first
preached without notes. In interviews with Gibson, bishop of London, he defended
himself against charges of irregularity; he annoyed Gibson by giving him
formal notice (14 November) of his intention to rebaptise a woman who had
received baptism from a dissenter. The Islington churchwardens, disliking
his ministrations, questioned the legality of his position, and kept him
forcibly from the pulpit. Stonehouse was obliged to end the engagement in
May 1739. His frequent preaching for Henry Piers, vicar of Bexley, Kent,
brought a summons to Lambeth and a censure (19 June) from Archbishop Potter.
On 1 July he preached on justification before the University of' Oxford.
A walk through a field, to preach on Kennington Common, brought an action
for trespass, which cost him (29 July) nearly 20£.
He entered upon the itinerant ministry on 16 August 1739, riding to the west
of England. Taking his brother's place at Bristol, he made this his headquarters,
entering on his ministry at Weavers' Hall on 31 August. For the next seventeen
years he pursued his evangelistic journeys, finding hearers up and down England
and Wales, from the 'keelmen' of Newcastle-on-Tyne to the 'tinners' of Cornwall.
His good sense appears in his remarks (1743) on the convulsive paroxysms
which began in 1739; some were counterfeit, others could be controlled, the
remainder he could not accept as divine signs. On two occasions be visited
Ireland (9 September 1747 to 20 March 1748, and 13 August to 8 October 1748).
He had to endure much rough usage, yet at Kinsale, he reports (8 September
1748), the 'presbyterians say I am a presbyterian; the churchgoers that I
am a minister of theirs; and the catholics are sure I am a good catholic
in my heart.' Except that he did not again cross to Ireland, his marriage
(1749) made little change in his plans; his wife accompanied his journeys,
riding behind him on a pillion. Her fine voice led the singing at his religious
meetings. By a strong measure he frustrated his brother's unwise matrimonial
project of the same year. Though he had encouraged lay preaching, and had
himself (in July 1740, in the schoolroom at Kingswood, near Bristol, JACKSON,
ii. 473) been the first to administer the communion to his followers, repelled
from this rite at the Temple church, Bristol, he took alarm when the views
of some lay preachers pointed to the severance of methodism from the church
of England. The celebration of the eucharist by Charles Perronet, who had
been his companion to Ireland, he denounced as a 'vile example' (Letter in
TYERMAN, John Wesley, 1870, ii. 202). In the critical year 1755 he
left abruptly the conference at Leeds, which, after three days' discussion
of the question of separation from the church, decided (9 May) that, 'whether
it was lawful or not, it was no ways expedient.' He attended the conference
of 1756 (in August, at Bristol), but was not satisfied. Shortly afterwards
he went on a mission to the north of England 'to confirm the methodists in
the church.' After his return to Bristol on 6 November 1756 he took no further
part in the itinerant ministry. It is said that he refused a benefice worth
500£ a year, and declined a fortune proffered him by a lady who had
quarrelled with her relatives (MOORE, 1825, ii. 372).
When methodist preachers began to take the benefit of the Toleration Act,
he would have had them leave methodism for dissent. As an alternative, he
offered to use all his interest to obtain their admission to Anglican orders.
He writes (27 March 1760) to John Nelson: 'Rather than see thee a dissenting
minister, I wish to see thee smiling in thy coffin' (JACKSON, ii. 185). His
health suffered; he was compelled in 1761 to retire from active duties to
Bath. From 1762 the Wesley's diverged in their treatment of a point of doctrine.
Both had preached 'perfection;' Charles now, in view of current fanatical
claims, insisted on a gradual process, reaching a higher goal. No difference
of opinion or of policy injured their mutual confidence or disturbed the
frankness of their intercourse. Charles was always the champion of his brother's
reputation, even when most suspicious of the aims of his followers.
In 1771 He removed with his family to London, occupying a leasehold house,
1 Chesterfield Street, Marylebone, which was given to him, furnished, for
the remainder of the lease (over twenty years) by Mrs. Gumley. He preached
in turn at the Foundery; after the opening (1 Nov. 1778) of City Road Chapel,
he preached there twice every Sunday during church hours (contrary to his
brother's custom), and reluctantly submitted to share this duty with others.
His preaching powers were waning; occasionally, as of old, he could pour
forth 'a torrent of impetuous and commanding eloquence,' but his usual delivery
was subdued and slow, with frequent pauses (JACKSON, Life and Times,
1873, p. 314), and his sermons were sometimes interrupted by intervals of
singing (JACKSON, ii. 433). He was assiduous in visiting condemned malefactors,
including the notorious William Dodd. To his brother's ordinations, which
began in 1784, be was vehemently opposed; there seems no ground for Jackson's
opinion that 'he became less hostile' to the measures, though resolved to
have no breach with his brother, but to leave in his hands the conduct of
methodism. In 1786 he first met William Wilberforce at the house of Hannah
More.
At the beginning of 1788 his strength entirely failed; by March he was unable
to write. On his brother's advice he was attended by John Whitehead (1740?-1804).
He died on 29 March 1788. Owing to the misdirection of a letter, the news
did not reach his brother till 4 April, too late for attendance at the funeral.
On 5 April he was buried, at his own express desire, in the churchyard of
St. Marylebone, immediately behind the old church; the pall was borne by
eight Anglican divine; the expenses of his funeral (13£ 16s. 6d.) were
met by a private subscription (TYERMAN, John Wesley, iii. 225);
a small obelisk marks his grave. In City Road Chapel (where he had declined
burial, the ground being unconsecrated) is a marble tablet to his memory.
His profile, with that of his brother, is on the tablet placed (1871) in
Westminster Abbey on the initiative of Dean Stanley. His portrait (1771)
by John Russell, in the Wesleyan Centenary Hall, has often been engraved.
Another portrait (1784) is in Whitehead's 'Life,' engraved by J. Fittler,
and again in Moore's 'Life' (1824), engraved by W. T. Fry.
He was of low stature but not slight, near-sighted, and abrupt and even odd
in manner. Always absent-minded, he could read and compose at his ease, oblivious
of his company. Like his brother, he wrote Byrom's shorthand. His manuscripts
were always models of neatness. In other respects his more methodical habits
in later life were probably due to the influence of his wife (WATSON, J.
Wesley, p. 410).
In old age 'he rode every day (clothed for winter even in summer) a little
horse, grey with age' (MOORE, 1825, ii. 369). Tender and sensitive, his family
affections were strong; his warmth of temper never led him into angry heats;
to his brother he looked up with a loving reverence, undisturbed by their
differences. In defensive repartee he was as ready, though not so pungent,
as his brother. He had no faculty for government. Though he had plenty of
courage, he was swayed by conflicting feelings, with the result that his
half-measures conveyed an impression of timidity.
He married (8 April 1749) Sarah (born 12 Oct. 1726; died 28 Dec. 1822), third
daughter of Marmaduke Gwynne (died 1769) of Garth, Breconshire; the marriage,
celebrated by his brother John, was a most happy one. His widow had an annuity
of 100£ from John Wesley, on whose death it was commuted, at her request,
for a capital sum. After the expenditure of this she was relieved from straits
by an annuity provided by William Wilberforce in conjunction with two friends.
The methodist body followed with an annuity, which was continued to the surviving
children. Of Wesley's eight children, five died in infancy. Charles (1757-1834)
and Samuel (1766-1837) are separately noticed. The surviving daughter, Sarah,
a woman of great culture, who mixed in the best literary society of her day,
died at Bristol, unmarried, on 19 Sept. 1828, aged 68.
John Wesley writes of his brother: 'His least praise was his talent for poetry;
although Dr. Watts did not scruple to say that single poem, "Wrestling
Jacob," was worth all the verses he himself had written' (Minutes
of Conference, 1788). Yet among the many services rendered by Charles
Wesley to the cause of religion, his work as a hymn-writer stands pre-eminent.
Exercising an hereditary gift, he had early written verses both in Latin
and English, but the opening of the vein of his spiritual genius was a consequence
of the inward crisis of Whit-Sunday 1738. Two days later his hymn upon his
conversion was written. He doubted at first whether he had done right in
even showing it to a friend. The first collection of hymns issued by John
Wesley (1737) contains nothing by Charles. From 1739 to 1746 the brothers
issued eight collections in their joint names. Some difficulty has been felt
in assigning to each his respective compositions. To John are usually given
all translations from German originals, as it is doubtful whether Charles
could read that language; and if this is not conclusive (as the originals
might have been interpreted for him), a strong argument may be found in his
constant inability to write on subjects proposed to him, and not spontaneously
suggested by his own mind. All original hymns, not expressly claimed by John
in his journals and other writings, are usually given to Charles. But it
must be remembered that these were edited by John, who adapted his brother's
pieces for public use, both by omission and by combination. Charles Wesley's
untouched work is to be seen in publications issued in his sole name, and
in posthumous prints from his manuscript. He is said to have written 6,500
hymns (Overton in JULIAN'S Hymnology, 1892, p. 1258); about five
hundred are in constant use. Dealing with every topic from the point of view
of spiritual experience, they rarely subside into the meditative mood. Rich
in melody, they invite to singing, and in the best of them there is a lyrical
swing and an undertone of mystical fervor which both vitalize and mellow
the substratum of doctrine. Much attention has been directed to his sacramental
hymns (1745), in which the real presence is expressly taught. Other points
are noted in Warington's 'Echoes of the Prayer-book in Wesley's Hymns' [1876].
The following collections appear to contain exclusively his own hymns:
1. 'Hymns on God's Everlasting Love,' 2 parts, 1741.
2. 'For the Nativity,' 1744.
3. 'For the Watchnight,' 1744.
4. 'Funeral Hymns,' 1744, enlarged, 1759.
5. 'For Times of Trouble,' 1745, revised edition, same year; additional,
1746.
6. 'On the Lord's Supper,' 1745.
7. 'Gloria Patri ... to the Trinity,' 1746.
8. 'On the great Festivals,' 1746.
9. 'For Ascension Day,' 1746.
10. 'For Our Lord's Resurrection,' 1746.
11. 'Graces before and after Meat,' 1746.
12. 'For the Public Thanksgiving' 1746.
13. 'For those that seek and those that have Redemption,' 1747.
14. 'On his Marriage,' 1749.
15. 'On Occasion of his being prosecuted in Ireland,' 1749.
16. 'Hymns and Sacred Poems,' Bristol, 1749, 2 vols.
17. 'For New Year's Day,' 1750.
18. 'For the Year 1756,' 1756.
19. 'Of Intercession,' 1758.
20. 'For the Use of Methodist Preachers,' 1758.
21. 'On the expected Invasion,' 1759.
22. 'On the Thanksgiving Day,' 1759.
23. 'For those to whom Christ is all,' 1761.
24. 'Short Hymns on ... Passages of ... Scripture,' 1762, 2 vols.
25. 'For Children,' 1763.
26. 'For the Use of Families,' 1767.
27. 'On the Trinity,' 1767.
28. 'Preparation for Death,' 1772.
29. 'In the Time of the Tumults,' 1780.
30. 'For the Nation,' 1782.
31. 'For Condemned Malefactors,' 1785.
A few hymns were first printed separately. Other poetical publications were
an 'Elegy,' Bristol, 1742, on Robert Jones of Fonmon Castle; an 'Epistle,'
1755, to John Wesley; and an 'Epistle,' 1771, to George Whitefield (written
1755). His poetical works, including many not before published, are contained
in the 'Poetical Works of John and Charles Wesley,' 1868-72, 13 vols., edited
by George Osborn. A large number of his hymns, still unpublished, were discovered
in the Wesleyan archives in 1895. In prose Wesley published a few sermons,
and 'A Short Account of the Death of Mrs. H. Richardson' [1741]; 5th ed.
Newcastle-on-Tyne, 1743. His university sermon on 4 April 1742 ran through
sixteen editions in seven years, and was translated into Welsh. A volume
of 'Sermons,' 1816, issued by his widow, contains twelve (mostly early) sermons
(with an additional one by John Wesley) and a 'Memoir,' probably by his daughter
Sarah.
[Biographies of Charles Wesley are included in most of the biographies of
John Wesley; of special value are those by Whitehead, 1793 (also issued separately),
and by Moore, 1824-5. An independent Life, with much use of unpublished correspondence,
was produced, 1841, 2 vols. (abridged as 'Memoirs,' 1848, 1 vol.), by Thomas
Jackson, who also edited Charles Wesley's Journal (1736-56), 1849, 2 vols.
with selections from his correspondence. Additional particulars are in the
Life by John Telford [1886]. See also Forshall's Westminster School, 1884;
Foster's Alumni Oxon. 1715-1886, iv. 1526 ; Julian's Dict. of Hymnology,
1892, which has been followed for the bibliography (articles 'Methodist Hymnody'
and 'Wesley Family'); Green's Bibliography of the Works of John and Charles
Wesley, 1896; authorities cited above, and references to art.]
Copied and edited by Stephen Ross for WholesomeWords.org from Dictionary
of National Biography. London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1899.
More Information on Charles
Wesley |